Gaming News

All the latest Xbox and gaming news. Only TA Newshounds can post in this forum.

GTA 6 won't be at The Game Awards after all, as Rockstar confirms trailer for Dec 5

  • zDrUnKeNMoNkEyzzDrUnKeNMoNkEyz2,114,046
    Posted on 01 December 23 at 23:08
    That was nice of them. Would’ve legit destroyed anything at that stupid FkN “award,” show.
    Monkey/s
  • zDrUnKeNMoNkEyzzDrUnKeNMoNkEyz2,114,046
    Posted on 01 December 23 at 23:19
    Eternal8laze591 said:
    zDrUnKeNMoNkEyz said:
    That was nice of them. Would’ve legit destroyed anything at that stupid FkN “award,” show.
    Depends what you're into. Couldn't care less about GTA VI.
    Nah, not really. As a whole, anyone that isn’t interested, is in a niche pocket. This is a global game, that people that rarely even game, look forward to. I’m personally not saying it’s the end all be all to me, but as far as a game having eyes on it, nothing ever compares to the scale that GTA brings in.
    Monkey/s
  • Posted on 01 December 23 at 23:25
    zDrUnKeNMoNkEyz said:
    Eternal8laze591 said:
    zDrUnKeNMoNkEyz said:
    That was nice of them. Would’ve legit destroyed anything at that stupid FkN “award,” show.
    Depends what you're into. Couldn't care less about GTA VI.
    Nah, not really. As a whole, anyone that isn’t interested, is in a niche pocket. This is a global game, that people that rarely even game, look forward to. I’m personally not saying it’s the end all be all to me, but as far as a game having eyes on it, nothing ever compares to the scale that GTA brings in.
    Certainly from a reach perspective, GTA will get the most views over time. No doubt. I guess from an impact perspective, though - I can think of many other trailers that would get a bigger pop outta me. Which is why I'm tuning into TGAs for the most part.
  • abootXBericabootXBeric846,519
    Posted yesterday at 01:57
    I mean, it was obvious. GTA is many times bigger than Geoff's sad little award show.
  • MR MITT3NSMR MITT3NS696,271
    Posted yesterday at 02:38
    8-O
  • regretregret1,749,611
    Posted yesterday at 02:53, Edited yesterday at 02:55 by regret
    Lmao @ the people who thought Rockstar needs the Video Game Awards. GTA6 is massively bigger than the Keighleys and I doubt they could afford what Rockstar would ask for.
  • regretregret1,749,611
    Posted yesterday at 02:53
    abootXBeric said:
    I mean, it was obvious. GTA is many times bigger than Geoff's sad little award show.
    Exactly. 😂
  • zDrUnKeNMoNkEyzzDrUnKeNMoNkEyz2,114,046
    Posted yesterday at 03:13
    Eternal8laze591 said:
    zDrUnKeNMoNkEyz said:
    Eternal8laze591 said:
    zDrUnKeNMoNkEyz said:
    That was nice of them. Would’ve legit destroyed anything at that stupid FkN “award,” show.
    Depends what you're into. Couldn't care less about GTA VI.
    Nah, not really. As a whole, anyone that isn’t interested, is in a niche pocket. This is a global game, that people that rarely even game, look forward to. I’m personally not saying it’s the end all be all to me, but as far as a game having eyes on it, nothing ever compares to the scale that GTA brings in.
    Certainly from a reach perspective, GTA will get the most views over time. No doubt. I guess from an impact perspective, though - I can think of many other trailers that would get a bigger pop outta me. Which is why I'm tuning into TGAs for the most part.
    Agreed, was just simply saying/implying it would more or less over shadow anything else shown (to the masses at least,) that I’d prefer it be separate, so small to big games would still get their time to shine and eyes on em.toast
    Monkey/s
  • Posted yesterday at 04:10
    NeuroticAlias said:
    Let’s just hope it doesn’t go all woke and politically correct to please a few idiots.
    Anyone that uses woke unironically to criticise something is suffering from severe brain rot and should seek therapy.
    .
  • IVIr IVIeNsAIVIr IVIeNsA1,145,038
    Posted yesterday at 07:09, Edited yesterday at 08:39 by IVIr IVIeNsA
    WrathOfIndra said:
    Quantium G said:
    Who cares? After III, they're all the same game with a new coat of paint. Just like COD.
    Might be the worst take I've ever heard lol.
    It's a post that blends profound ignorance with exemplary stupidity into an ensemble so monumentally wrong you could use it as a textbook example of Poe's Law. I fear however, there is no underlying satirical or ironic commentary whatsoever.

    OT - GTA VI, gameplay wise is going to be amazing, the world is going to be staggering, but even if the online portion is huge, it's going to seem sparse at launch and fo a long time after, content wise, compared to the decade of regular drops V fans got accustomed to. Couple that with the threat of the previously equal opportunities, 'everyone is a target for caricature and mockery' ethos of V, shifting to either a 'let's not offend anyone', or worse, a biased political messaging exercise, and there is potential for GTA VI to become the most hated game of all time. Regardless, Rockstar are going to have an obscene amount of cash to count.
  • IVIr IVIeNsAIVIr IVIeNsA1,145,038
    Posted yesterday at 08:03, Edited yesterday at 08:52 by IVIr IVIeNsA
    TheDylanator36 said:
    NeuroticAlias said:
    Let’s just hope it doesn’t go all woke and politically correct to please a few idiots.
    Anyone that uses woke unironically to criticise something is suffering from severe brain rot and should seek therapy.
    More language policing and the usual suggestion that if you're not on programme, psychiatric illness is the only possible cause... nothing like Stalinist Russia or Cultural Revolution China at all /s. The irony of your accusation when amongst your political peers are people who identify as dogs and skyscrapers, people who fetishise my little pony, bug chasers, and people who upload videos of themselves removing their own genitalia in their kitchen, having been groomed and encouraged to do so by the 'loving' online communities to which they belong. Left wing leaders and ideologues are so entrenched in double standards, contradictions, cognitive dissonance and flat-out poor logic they can't even complete basic tasks such as 'define woman' without going into meltdown for fear of saying something that was ok yesterday but is now verboten under the latest directives (2015: 'feminism yay', 2020: 'evil nAzI TERFs'). Go check the evidence my good man, mental health issues that require prescribed medication are orders of magnitude more common amongst people who self identify as being left wing.

    Woke is a left wing term which describes itself. If instead we speak of an all pervasive, intersectional, Neo Marxist agenda: an ever decaying purity spiral, that blames the grievances of all of the world squarely on the shoulders of white men exclusively. In which adherents compete with each other to have the greatest progressive stack of grievances, because the only valid moral and political currency isn't truth, but falsified victimhood. With the ultimate intent of those funding and promoting the agenda as seizing and redistributing the world's resources to a tiny clique of elites, whist the remaining 99.99999999% of mankind 'owns nothing and is happy', would that be ok with you? Or do we need to qualify that with a quick lesson on how Marxism was transformed by institutions like the Fabian Society and the Frankfurt School, and later numerous think tanks, in doing so shifting the economic owner/worker grievance meta that enabled bloody revolution in poor countries, but didn't wash in prosperous states, into today's 'blame the white man for everything', frogs in the pot, tip toe into totalitarianism angle?

    Woke is easier to write, if it's all the same bud.
  • Dave BodomDave Bodom2,428,720
    Posted yesterday at 09:29
    It'll really depend on the single player/online split for me personally, I had absolutely no interest in GTA:O and after how focussed it quickly became and with how they tried to push it huge on RDR, i'm skeptical about the single player as it was already a massive cashcow in GTA.
  • hammerpunchhammerpunch737,589
    Posted yesterday at 09:42
    Won't watch the show but will be here on TA reading everything about what went down music
    3 can keep a secret. If 2 are dead
  • Posted yesterday at 16:40
    IVIr IVIeNsA said:
    TheDylanator36 said:
    NeuroticAlias said:
    Let’s just hope it doesn’t go all woke and politically correct to please a few idiots.
    Anyone that uses woke unironically to criticise something is suffering from severe brain rot and should seek therapy.
    More language policing and the usual suggestion that if you're not on programme, psychiatric illness is the only possible cause... nothing like Stalinist Russia or Cultural Revolution China at all /s. The irony of your accusation when amongst your political peers are people who identify as dogs and skyscrapers, people who fetishise my little pony, bug chasers, and people who upload videos of themselves removing their own genitalia in their kitchen, having been groomed and encouraged to do so by the 'loving' online communities to which they belong. Left wing leaders and ideologues are so entrenched in double standards, contradictions, cognitive dissonance and flat-out poor logic they can't even complete basic tasks such as 'define woman' without going into meltdown for fear of saying something that was ok yesterday but is now verboten under the latest directives (2015: 'feminism yay', 2020: 'evil nAzI TERFs'). Go check the evidence my good man, mental health issues that require prescribed medication are orders of magnitude more common amongst people who self identify as being left wing.

    Woke is a left wing term which describes itself. If instead we speak of an all pervasive, intersectional, Neo Marxist agenda: an ever decaying purity spiral, that blames the grievances of all of the world squarely on the shoulders of white men exclusively. In which adherents compete with each other to have the greatest progressive stack of grievances, because the only valid moral and political currency isn't truth, but falsified victimhood. With the ultimate intent of those funding and promoting the agenda as seizing and redistributing the world's resources to a tiny clique of elites, whist the remaining 99.99999999% of mankind 'owns nothing and is happy', would that be ok with you? Or do we need to qualify that with a quick lesson on how Marxism was transformed by institutions like the Fabian Society and the Frankfurt School, and later numerous think tanks, in doing so shifting the economic owner/worker grievance meta that enabled bloody revolution in poor countries, but didn't wash in prosperous states, into today's 'blame the white man for everything', frogs in the pot, tip toe into totalitarianism angle?

    Woke is easier to write, if it's all the same bud.
    I can see you're cooking but no. 99% of people who use "woke" truly just suffer from a lack of critical thinking and a deficient vocabulary. They saw it on TV and that's why they use it.
  • IVIr IVIeNsAIVIr IVIeNsA1,145,038
    Posted yesterday at 17:16
    AnEternal8laze591 said:
    IVIr IVIeNsA said:
    TheDylanator36 said:
    NeuroticAlias said:
    Let’s just hope it doesn’t go all woke and politically correct to please a few idiots.
    Anyone that uses woke unironically to criticise something is suffering from severe brain rot and should seek therapy.
    More language policing and the usual suggestion that if you're not on programme, psychiatric illness is the only possible cause... nothing like Stalinist Russia or Cultural Revolution China at all /s. The irony of your accusation when amongst your political peers are people who identify as dogs and skyscrapers, people who fetishise my little pony, bug chasers, and people who upload videos of themselves removing their own genitalia in their kitchen, having been groomed and encouraged to do so by the 'loving' online communities to which they belong. Left wing leaders and ideologues are so entrenched in double standards, contradictions, cognitive dissonance and flat-out poor logic they can't even complete basic tasks such as 'define woman' without going into meltdown for fear of saying something that was ok yesterday but is now verboten under the latest directives (2015: 'feminism yay', 2020: 'evil nAzI TERFs'). Go check the evidence my good man, mental health issues that require prescribed medication are orders of magnitude more common amongst people who self identify as being left wing.

    Woke is a left wing term which describes itself. If instead we speak of an all pervasive, intersectional, Neo Marxist agenda: an ever decaying purity spiral, that blames the grievances of all of the world squarely on the shoulders of white men exclusively. In which adherents compete with each other to have the greatest progressive stack of grievances, because the only valid moral and political currency isn't truth, but falsified victimhood. With the ultimate intent of those funding and promoting the agenda as seizing and redistributing the world's resources to a tiny clique of elites, whist the remaining 99.99999999% of mankind 'owns nothing and is happy', would that be ok with you? Or do we need to qualify that with a quick lesson on how Marxism was transformed by institutions like the Fabian Society and the Frankfurt School, and later numerous think tanks, in doing so shifting the economic owner/worker grievance meta that enabled bloody revolution in poor countries, but didn't wash in prosperous states, into today's 'blame the white man for everything', frogs in the pot, tip toe into totalitarianism angle?

    Woke is easier to write, if it's all the same bud.
    I can see you're cooking but no. 99% of people who use "woke" truly just suffer from a lack of critical thinking and a deficient vocabulary. They saw it on TV and that's why they use it.
    The left anointed itself as 'woke' as a point of pride though... look up the history of the word. Yet somehow 'woke' becomes invalid and a goto for stupid people if it's used by ideological opposition? So if I stand up and announce I am woke, I am intellectually and morally superior, but when the guy next to me points at me and says woke, he's a moron? As I said, doublers standards. It's in popular use because everyone understands the implications of it's presence, in whatever sphere it has metastasised into.
  • Posted yesterday at 17:36
    IVIr IVIeNsA said:
    AnEternal8laze591 said:
    IVIr IVIeNsA said:
    TheDylanator36 said:
    NeuroticAlias said:
    Let’s just hope it doesn’t go all woke and politically correct to please a few idiots.
    Anyone that uses woke unironically to criticise something is suffering from severe brain rot and should seek therapy.
    More language policing and the usual suggestion that if you're not on programme, psychiatric illness is the only possible cause... nothing like Stalinist Russia or Cultural Revolution China at all /s. The irony of your accusation when amongst your political peers are people who identify as dogs and skyscrapers, people who fetishise my little pony, bug chasers, and people who upload videos of themselves removing their own genitalia in their kitchen, having been groomed and encouraged to do so by the 'loving' online communities to which they belong. Left wing leaders and ideologues are so entrenched in double standards, contradictions, cognitive dissonance and flat-out poor logic they can't even complete basic tasks such as 'define woman' without going into meltdown for fear of saying something that was ok yesterday but is now verboten under the latest directives (2015: 'feminism yay', 2020: 'evil nAzI TERFs'). Go check the evidence my good man, mental health issues that require prescribed medication are orders of magnitude more common amongst people who self identify as being left wing.

    Woke is a left wing term which describes itself. If instead we speak of an all pervasive, intersectional, Neo Marxist agenda: an ever decaying purity spiral, that blames the grievances of all of the world squarely on the shoulders of white men exclusively. In which adherents compete with each other to have the greatest progressive stack of grievances, because the only valid moral and political currency isn't truth, but falsified victimhood. With the ultimate intent of those funding and promoting the agenda as seizing and redistributing the world's resources to a tiny clique of elites, whist the remaining 99.99999999% of mankind 'owns nothing and is happy', would that be ok with you? Or do we need to qualify that with a quick lesson on how Marxism was transformed by institutions like the Fabian Society and the Frankfurt School, and later numerous think tanks, in doing so shifting the economic owner/worker grievance meta that enabled bloody revolution in poor countries, but didn't wash in prosperous states, into today's 'blame the white man for everything', frogs in the pot, tip toe into totalitarianism angle?

    Woke is easier to write, if it's all the same bud.
    I can see you're cooking but no. 99% of people who use "woke" truly just suffer from a lack of critical thinking and a deficient vocabulary. They saw it on TV and that's why they use it.
    The left anointed itself as 'woke' as a point of pride though... look up the history of the word. Yet somehow 'woke' becomes invalid and a goto for stupid people if it's used by ideological opposition? So if I stand up and announce I am woke, I am intellectually and morally superior, but when the guy next to me points at me and says woke, he's a moron? As I said, doublers standards. It's in popular use because everyone understands the implications of it's presence, in whatever sphere it has metastasised into.
    I haven't seen anyone describe themselves as woke in at least 4 years. The term has been completely co-opted by now.
  • afrekafrek2,656,144
    Posted yesterday at 18:02
    Allgorhythm said:
    Raheam X said:
    Story I'm sure will be decent but I'm not expecting online to be any fun. Too much money to be made in microtransactions.
    Exactly.
    I don’t understand all this talk about the microtransactions in online. I’ve played the online for over 1000+ hours, never have had the temptation of buying shark cards, nor was I bombarded with messages telling me I should buy them. They don’t provide any extra benefit to the people buying them, online gives you money without even really trying.

    Not sure why people are hating on the online because of them.
  • IVIr IVIeNsAIVIr IVIeNsA1,145,038
    Posted yesterday at 18:28
    Which is part of the reason the left has to continuously shift it's use of language, it's not just the purity spiral shifting the Overton Window, creating new opportunities for words to become offensive. Even if the left became static (impossible) just using left wing terms as they are defined by the left would always inevitably become insulting to the left, because their values and ideas are so patently abhorrent to the average person. The stigma creates itself when the left astroturfs their new buzzwords via the media, and those who are naturally agreeable and conformist parrot them ad nauseam, and too, with a morally superior tone, mock and admonish those who are not yet buying into the latest dystopian content drop, never failing to signal to people that they themselves are definitely part of the 'insert new buzzword' club.

    People who oppose take a while to catch on because everything is always repackaged with an ostensibly friendly, often emotive and euphemistic label that belies the nefarious intent behind it. But then people start to notice the behaviour or motives of the people who throw the new word around. 'Woke', 'Diversity is our strength', etc, meme grade ironic mockery ensues... And of course the opposite comes into play when they are labelling enemies; 'Nazi', 'Far right extremist', 'Fascist', etc... massively disproportionate verbal attacks for holding yesterdays views, they try to destroy peoples' lives for wrongthink. The result is the left destroys it's own terminology the way it destroys it's own followers, until in the end only the most rabid of ideologues remain to enact the purge, man the gulag's guard towers and operate the torture chambers. And the victims can point at their oppressors and say 'woke' and everybody knows it's true, even though the guilty are 5 buzzword labels for themselves further down the road to damnation.

    If the ideology was sound, there would be no need to change terms or change the parameters of acceptable behaviour. Terms shouldn't be so easy to co-opt.

    Nice chat :) I'll read if you reply but I won't reply again. This comment section has more than enough of my views.
  • AllgorhythmAllgorhythm648,361
    Posted yesterday at 18:35
    afrek said:
    Allgorhythm said:
    Raheam X said:
    Story I'm sure will be decent but I'm not expecting online to be any fun. Too much money to be made in microtransactions.
    Exactly.
    I don’t understand all this talk about the microtransactions in online. I’ve played the online for over 1000+ hours, never have had the temptation of buying shark cards, nor was I bombarded with messages telling me I should buy them. They don’t provide any extra benefit to the people buying them, online gives you money without even really trying.

    Not sure why people are hating on the online because of them.
    You may not use shark cards but many people do. Thus, GTA Online has become a pay-to-win game. Shark card players are using real money to buy the most powerful weapons and vehicles. It's not fair to the people playing legitimately--including you. smile
  • OBlockMafiaOBlockMafia143,202
    Posted yesterday at 19:52
    Can’t wait
Want to join in the discussion? Please log in or Register For Free to comment.
Hide ads
Hide ads